The Aurora Sentinel reports that Aurora City Council is considering an emergency resolution to restrict public and media communications from the Aurora Police Department, including social media posts and press releases. The proposal, brought by Councilmember Alison Coombs, would require police communications to follow city communications standards and would prohibit posting mugshots in most cases until a suspect is convicted.
The resolution also seeks to limit police officials from commenting in their official capacity on pending or enacted legislation unless approved. Police Chief Todd Chamberlain says the move would silence the department when its facts or views do not align with certain political groups. Coombs says the goal is professionalism, accuracy, and stopping what she views as politicized messaging. Translation: the city council does not like what the police are saying, so now the police need a hall monitor.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Aurora lawmakers are considering restrictions on police communications, including social media posts and press releases. Because apparently criminals can move fast, but police statements need to stop by the Department of Approved Feelings.
- The proposal would block mugshots in most cases until conviction. The bad guys get a privacy upgrade. The good guys get a leash.
- Chief Chamberlain says the resolution would unfairly silence his office and limit candid public safety communication. That sounds less like transparency and more like putting duct tape over the fire alarm because the noise is politically inconvenient.
- Coombs cited concerns about police comments on suspects’ personal lives, legislation, and messaging she says undermines public trust. Fine. Require professionalism. But do not pretend muzzling police is the same thing as building trust.
- The proposal also follows Aurora Police criticizing SB26-190, a state bill involving transparency requirements after officer-involved shootings. So the police criticized policy, and the city’s answer is to make sure they think twice before doing that again. Very democratic. Lowercase “d” doing a lot of work there.
My Bottom Line
Let me just drop this right here. Remember what I said about what happens when Democrats take control of a city council? Aurora is now Exhibit A with a blinking neon sign. The political winds shift, and suddenly the people catching the bad guys are treated like the problem.
Nobody serious thinks police should be sloppy, reckless, or political in official communications. Facts matter. Professionalism matters. Accuracy matters. But this kind of move does not feel like a good-faith effort to improve communication. It feels like a city council majority trying to put a choke collar on law enforcement because the police department said things the political class did not enjoy hearing.
That is the modern progressive public safety model in one ugly little nutshell. Suspects get sensitivity. Criminals get privacy. Police get suspicion. The public gets carefully curated messaging from city communications staff while everyone pretends that makes neighborhoods safer.
The good guys who catch the bad guys are now treated as the bad guys, while the bad guys continue to be, um, bad. And when crime becomes harder to talk about honestly, it becomes harder to fight honestly. That is not transparency. That is narrative management with a city seal slapped on top.
Aurora voters changed the council, and now they are getting the governing philosophy that came with it. If you want to know what a Democrat-majority council does when handed public safety policy, watch closely. They do not start by asking how to make police more effective. They start by asking how to make police more quiet.
Source: Aurora Sentinel
Share your thoughts...