News Sheet

Colorado Utility Rates and the 911 Reliability Bill

Colorado utility rates collage with 911 dispatch imagery, power lines, and a monthly bill
Reliability is important. So are receipts.
Written by Scott K. James

The PUC is weighing 911 upgrades, Xcel rate hikes, and transmission costs. Reliability matters, but Coloradans deserve receipts.

The Colorado Public Utilities Commission held one of those government meetings that most people never watch but that can have a very real impact on daily life. The Denver Gazette reports the commission is reviewing upgrades to Colorado’s 911 emergency communications infrastructure while simultaneously advancing several major utility rate cases that could increase monthly electric and natural gas bills later this year. One issue is about public safety. The other is about your wallet. Unfortunately, both eventually arrive in your mailbox.

The commission is reviewing a proposal from Lumen Technologies to modernize portions of Colorado’s 911 system by adding infrastructure upgrades and network redundancy designed to keep emergency calls flowing during outages and disasters. At the same time, Xcel Energy is pursuing substantial electric and natural gas rate increases that could raise residential bills by roughly $17.50 per month combined if approved as requested.

The Bullet Point Brief

  • Lumen wants to modernize Colorado’s 911 infrastructure with upgraded systems and additional redundancy designed to keep emergency calls reaching dispatchers during outages and disasters. That is a serious conversation worth having.
  • Xcel’s electric rate case seeks a $356 million annual revenue increase that would raise the average residential bill by about $9.94 per month. Small businesses would see increases as well.
  • Xcel’s natural gas rate case seeks another $190 million annually, translating into an estimated $7.59 monthly increase for residential customers. Pipeline safety, leak detection, and system modernization are cited as key drivers.
  • The PUC is also advancing the massive Colorado Power Pathway transmission project, a 550-mile effort intended to connect new generation resources to the grid. Infrastructure is not free. The question is who pays and whether the promised benefits actually materialize.
  • Every proposal arrives wrapped in words like “reliability,” “modernization,” and “resilience.” Fine. But those words are not payment methods. Somebody still gets the bill.

My Bottom Line

This story is really about basic competence.

Coloradans are not asking for luxury. They want 911 to answer when they call. They want the lights to stay on. They want heat in the winter. They want infrastructure that works when things go sideways.

Most people are perfectly willing to pay for real reliability and genuine public safety improvements.

What they are tired of is being treated like an ATM.

The 911 portion of this discussion deserves to stand on its own. Emergency communications are a core government function. If the system needs redundancy to keep calls moving during disasters and outages, then let’s have that conversation seriously. What exactly is being upgraded? What does it cost? What performance standards will be achieved? How will taxpayers know the investment actually delivered results? Those are reasonable questions.

The utility side deserves equal scrutiny.

Xcel says the requested increases support reliability, safety, modernization, and infrastructure improvements. Fair enough. Those are legitimate objectives. But consumers deserve more than glossy promises and consultant-approved buzzwords. If rates increase, what measurable improvements should customers expect? What reliability metrics improve? What outage reductions are projected? What accountability exists if those improvements never materialize?

Because too often the process feels like this: utility requests money, regulators hold hearings, politicians issue statements, and families open their bills six months later wondering what exactly they purchased.

That is where skepticism becomes healthy.

I am not interested in cartoon arguments that utilities are evil or regulators are villains. Reality is more complicated than that. Infrastructure costs money. Maintenance costs money. Reliability costs money.

But so does everything else.

The public deserves transparency about what is being built, what it costs, who pays for it, and what success looks like.

And I would gently suggest that Colorado’s political class stop acting as though higher utility bills simply appear out of thin air like a summer thunderstorm. Policy choices have costs. Regulatory mandates have costs. Infrastructure decisions have costs. Energy decisions have costs.

The least government can do is be honest about them.

Coloradans deserve 911 systems that work, lights that stay on, heat that arrives when it is supposed to, and regulators who remember the public is not a revenue stream with a pulse.


Source: The Denver Gazette

About the author

Scott K. James

A 4th generation Northern Colorado native, Scott K. James is a veteran broadcaster, professional communicator, and principled leader. Widely recognized for his thoughtful, common-sense approach to addressing issues that affect families, businesses, and communities, Scott, his wife, Julie, and son, Jack, call Johnstown, Colorado, home. A former mayor of Johnstown, James is a staunch defender of the Constitution and the rule of law, the free market, and the power of the individual. Scott has delighted in a lifetime of public service and continues that service as a Weld County Commissioner representing District 2.

Share your thoughts...