Most of us understand the impulse.
You live on a quiet street. Then one day the GPS gods discover your neighborhood, and suddenly your road becomes a commuter shortcut, a delivery lane, and a shortcut for people who treat stop signs like decorative suggestions.
The cars get faster. The noise gets louder. The kids are closer to the curb. The dog walkers start looking both ways like they are crossing I-25.
At some point, a resident thinks, “Enough.”
That is human. That is fair. That is not villainy.
But then the phrase “public road” walks into the room and changes the conversation.
The Denver Gazette reports that Bow Mar, a small town near Littleton, has been considering gates to block non-residents from driving on some public roads. Residents have raised concerns about cut-through traffic and speeding, including a study showing one road had a 51 percent increase in southbound traffic between 2017 and 2025. The proposal includes RFID access for residents, app access, visitor and delivery codes, and emergency access. Two gate locations and one road closure have reportedly been approved, with estimated gate costs between about $333,000 and $455,000.
Translated into normal-person English: Colorado has reached the point where even roads may need a guest list.
Now, again, I am not sneering at Bow Mar residents.
Traffic is real. Safety is real. People blasting through neighborhoods because an app told them to shave four minutes off the drive are not exactly building Western civilization.
Every parent understands wanting fewer cars speeding past the house. Every homeowner understands wanting a little peace on the street where they live. But public access cannot become a velvet rope system for people with the right ZIP code. If a road is private, treat it like private property. If a road is public, treat it like public infrastructure.
That line matters.
In normal-person English, if taxpayers helped build it, maintain it, police it, insure it, or govern it, you do not get to slap a gate on it simply because your neighborhood got tired of being discovered by GPS.
Maybe the law allows some version of this. Maybe it does not. That is for lawyers, judges, and local officials to sort out without help from my blood pressure.
But the principle is not complicated. Public means public. Private means private. Government should be very careful about blurring those lines just because the situation is annoying.
Colorado folks are pretty generous about private property and local control. We understand boundaries. We understand neighborhood frustration. We understand wanting the people closest to a problem to have a say.
But we also have a pretty good nose for special treatment. And regular people do not like being told the road is public until someone important gets tired of seeing them on it.
There are lawful ways to deal with traffic: enforcement, design, signage, speed management, traffic studies, public hearings, and honest accountability. None of those are perfect. Some are irritating. Most take longer than anyone wants.
Welcome to self-government. It builds character and occasionally ulcers.
But the answer to public frustration should not be quietly turning public infrastructure into a members-only lane. Solve the traffic problem. Protect the kids. Slow down the shortcuts. Hold reckless drivers accountable.
But keep the lines clear.
Because once public access becomes negotiable, ordinary people always wonder who gets negotiated out first.
Source: The Denver Gazette
Share your thoughts...