The New York Post reports that Hartman, Colorado, a town of roughly 30 residents near the Kansas border, has been declared abandoned after its remaining trustees resigned, the town lost the ability to hold an election, and nobody was left in charge of infrastructure critical to delivering safe drinking water. Residents had already been under a boil-water order since at least February, while the town’s water system was reportedly being propped up by a temporary chlorine pump operated by outsiders.
The headline comes loaded with demands for arrests, allegations of embezzlement, and enough civic dysfunction to make a county fair demolition derby look well-organized. But the documented core is bad enough without decorating it with unproven crimes: Hartman had no Board of Trustees, no town clerk, no functioning election process, and no local authority capable of fixing the water system. The state finally declared the town abandoned because leaving residents in legal limbo during a health hazard was no longer an acceptable option.
That is the most basic government contract imaginable. Take the oath. Do the job. Answer the phone. Keep the water safe. Public office is not a costume you wear until the meeting gets uncomfortable.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Hartman’s three remaining trustees resigned on Jan. 14, leaving the town without any functioning municipal government. Apparently “local control” now includes everybody locally controlling their own escape route.
- The resignations reportedly followed a heated public meeting that ended in a physical fight among four older women. Nothing says stable governance like a trustee board collapsing after municipal cage night.
- Residents had been under a boil-water order since at least February, while outsiders managed a temporary chlorine pump. That is not a water policy. That is a bureaucratic tourniquet.
- The state found Hartman had no Board of Trustees, no town clerk, no ability to conduct an election, and no authority to repair infrastructure essential to water treatment and delivery. In government language, that is “legal limbo.” In normal language, nobody was minding the store.
- Residents are demanding arrests, but the article does not identify who should be charged, what specific statutes were allegedly violated, or what evidence would support prosecution. Anger is justified. Handcuffs still require receipts.
My Bottom Line
Accountability starts with facts. Who held which office? When did each person resign? What condition was the water system in at that moment? What warnings were issued? Who received them? Which county and state agencies had oversight authority, and when did they act? Those are not fussy procedural questions. Those are the foundation of any honest prosecution, civil or criminal.
The arrest talk makes a fine headline, but government failure does not need legal fireworks to be outrageous. The verified facts already describe a town left without leadership while residents faced a public-health problem and could not get their own government to function. Public service does not come with an eject button marked “press when accountability arrives.”
Colorado loves to preach local control, especially to rural communities. But local control cannot mean state and county institutions fold their arms until a town becomes a ghost ship. When a municipality owns critical water infrastructure and its government evaporates, somebody must have a clear duty to step in before residents are left drinking uncertainty and calling disconnected numbers.
Prove crimes before demanding convictions. But do not let the absence of an immediate criminal case become a fog machine for institutional cowardice. Officials who walk away from a public-health mess do not deserve anonymity, confusion, or endless bureaucratic buck-passing. They deserve a complete timeline, a public accounting, and consequences supported by the facts. That should alarm every taxpayer, because Hartman may be tiny, but the government shrug on display is plenty big.
Source: New York Post
Now It's Your Turn...