The Sentinel reports that Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman has been spending Friday nights and Saturday mornings at the Aurora Regional Navigation Center’s Tier One shelter to better understand how the city’s homelessness system is working. Coffman said the experience has shown him how complex and individualized homelessness is, and he is looking at possible changes, including a time limit on Tier One shelter stays so people are not simply allowed to “exist” there without moving toward services or self-sufficiency.
The respect I have for Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman cannot be understated. He is a tremendous and dedicated public servant. A mayor actually sleeping in the shelter beats the usual municipal ritual of forming a task force, hiring a consultant, and discovering poverty exists for $240,000. Give the man credit for getting close to the problem instead of managing it from a dais with a PowerPoint.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Coffman has been sleeping at the Navigation Center weekly since late February, using the same cot and seeing the shelter’s Tier One system firsthand. That is real effort. Most politicians prefer a photo op, a solemn nod, and a staff memo.
- The shelter uses a tiered model: Tier One offers basic shelter, Tier Two requires engagement with case managers and peer coaches, and Tier Three moves toward longer-term independent living with additional commitments, including full-time work. That is the right instinct: shelter should be a doorway, not a warehouse.
- Coffman said homelessness is complex and individualized, and that people cannot be lumped into one category. Good. The left too often turns homelessness into endless spending and no standards. The right can get too comfortable treating everyone like one bad decision in a sleeping bag. Both are wrong.
- The mayor is considering a time limit on Tier One so people are incentivized to engage with services and do not disappear inside the system. That is exactly the difference between empathy and indulgence.
- Coffman also said Aurora needs partners because no one entity can do everything, especially for serious mental health and addiction cases. That raises the first question first: where are the churches, nonprofits, families, recovery groups, and civic institutions? Why has this become a government problem by default?
My Bottom Line
Homelessness is human. Policy still has to be adult.
Some people need treatment. Some need work and structure. Some need shelter. Some need law enforcement. Some need all of the above. Government hates that because individualized solutions do not fit neatly on a grant application, and the professional compassion industry prefers programs that can be branded, staffed, renewed, and defended at budget time.
Coffman’s insight matters only if it changes policy. Sleeping one night, or many nights, in a shelter is insight, not sainthood. The measure is whether Aurora gets safer streets, cleaner public spaces, better exits from homelessness, and real help for people willing to take it.
And yes, this raises the bigger frustration. Aurora is sending tax measures to voters for roads and infrastructure, which are actual core functions of government. Fine. But why does government keep absorbing every social problem into its permanent portfolio while the basics get sent to the ballot? Public safety and infrastructure should come first. If City Hall wants to build a larger homelessness system, put that question plainly to voters instead.
Where are the churches? The Bible instructs Christians to care for one another. Not outsource every broken life to the government, not assume a city department can replace the body of Christ, and not pretend compassion is measured only by how many taxpayer dollars move through a system.
Coffman deserves credit for showing up. Now Aurora needs the harder conversation: what is government’s role, what is society’s role, what standards apply, and how do we help people without turning dependency into a civic business model?
Source: The Sentinel
Share your thoughts...