9News’ Alexander Kirk reports that Aurora has broken ground on a new $51.3 million animal shelter at Chambers Road and East 32nd Avenue. The planned 42,000-square-foot, two-story facility will replace Aurora’s current 13,000-square-foot shelter, which was built in the 1980s.
City officials say the new shelter will hold space for 250 animals, including dogs, cats, birds, reptiles, and small mammals. It is expected to include on-site veterinary spaces, outdoor play yards, and expanded adoption and foster areas, with construction wrapping up in late 2027 and the public opening planned for 2028.
That all sounds lovely. Pets are great. Rescue dogs are great. Nobody is against kindness to animals. But $51.3 million is still $51.3 million. Almost $500,000 will come from community donations, which is just under 1% of the project. The rest comes from impact fees, federal ARPA dollars, and city certificates of participation. Translation: the “animal lovers” brought a bake sale, and the taxpayers brought the dump truck.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Aurora is building a $51.3 million animal shelter. Not a homeless shelter. Not a mental health facility. Not a water plant. A shelter for the animals. Apparently a very nice one.
- The new facility will be more than three times the size of the current shelter, going from 13,000 square feet to 42,000 square feet. Somewhere, a city budget spreadsheet just purred and knocked a coffee mug off the counter.
- The city says the project will be funded through certificates of participation, impact fees, federal ARPA dollars, and nearly $500,000 in community donations. That donation piece is touching. It is also barely enough to buy the front door and maybe one tasteful plaque.
- Impact fees are generally sold as a way to help pay for infrastructure tied to growth. Roads, water, sewer, that sort of thing. You can argue an animal shelter is infrastructure. I would not. But I’m old-fashioned that way. I still think infrastructure should include things people drive on, drink from, or flush through.
- Then come the certificates of participation, my personal favorite form of government budget yoga. COPs are debt that somehow found a way around a vote. You are responsible for the note, but you did not get to approve it. That is not magic. That is dirty debt, in my opinion.
My Bottom Line
Budgeting is about priorities. Always. Every city council speech, every ribbon-cutting, every glossy rendering, every smiling photo with shovels in dirt eventually comes down to one sentence: this is what we chose to fund.
Aurora chose puppies over people.
That is blunt, but it is also fair. If the people of Aurora want a new animal shelter this badly, put the question in front of them and let them vote. Let residents decide whether $51.3 million for animal services is the next big municipal priority while the city, like every major Colorado city, still wrestles with homelessness, public safety, roads, affordability, and basic services that never seem to have enough money.
Instead, we get the usual modern government funding casserole: impact fees, ARPA money, and certificates of participation. ARPA, of course, was that sweet, sweet printed money that rained from the D.C. heavens during COVID. They printed all that money five years ago, and now nobody can afford anything. But sure, inflation is just a mysterious weather pattern.
And COPs? That is where my patience goes to die. If it is debt, call it debt. If taxpayers are on the hook, ask them first. TABOR exists because Coloradans understood a very simple truth: government will spend every dollar it can find, borrow against the next pile, and then explain the whole thing with a consultant PowerPoint.
I do not want to hear another lament out of the City of Aurora about the plight of the homeless ever again. Ever. Not after this. Again, I like animals. I like shelters. I like adoption. But when people are living in tents and city leaders still find $51.3 million for the animals, the moral lecture budget is officially closed.
Source: 9News
Share your thoughts...