Denver’s latest homeless count is being treated like a championship parade for Mayor Mike Johnston’s administration. According to The Denver Gazette, the city saw a 12.5% drop in overall homelessness this year, marking the first year-over-year decline in nearly a decade. Street homelessness reportedly dropped even more dramatically, down 64% since Johnston took office in 2023.
Naturally, Johnston’s team is presenting this as proof that the spending spree worked. The city has poured roughly $178 million into homelessness programs since he took office, including hotel conversions, shelter expansions, and a bureaucratic ecosystem large enough to require its own migration pattern. The mayor stood at the podium Wednesday morning declaring “historic reductions” while local media dutifully nodded along.
But buried in the article is the part nobody in Denver’s political class seems interested in discussing. The Point-In-Time count is a one-night snapshot that can be heavily influenced by weather, participation, and shelter usage. This year’s count happened during sub-freezing temperatures with cold weather shelters activated. Funny how that caveat suddenly gets whispered instead of shouted.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Denver says homelessness dropped 12.5%, which is the kind of statistic politicians print on glossy mailers right before asking for another billion dollars.
- Johnston’s administration has spent roughly $178 million attacking homelessness since 2023. Apparently in Denver, if something fails for years, the answer is always “have we tried making government even bigger?”
- The Point-In-Time count only measures one night in January. One. Night. That is less “scientific study” and more “census conducted during a snowstorm.”
- The article itself admits family and youth homelessness increased. But don’t worry, there will still be a self-congratulatory press conference with matching podium signs.
- Not once in the coverage does anyone seriously entertain the possibility that sealing the southern border might reduce transient homelessness pressure in major cities. Weird omission. Almost like there is no grant money attached to saying it out loud.
My Bottom Line
Here’s the part the political consultant class hates: sometimes problems improve because incentives change, not because government discovered a new program with a catchy acronym and a six-figure administrator attached to it.
Denver absolutely has people working hard to help the homeless. Churches do it. Nonprofits do it. Neighbors do it every single day without issuing themselves press releases. But modern government cannot resist turning compassion into an industry. Once that happens, every social problem becomes a revenue stream. Every crisis becomes a justification for more staff, more spending, and more permanent bureaucracy.
And now we are supposed to believe Mike Johnston personally defeated homelessness because the annual snapshot moved in the right direction during a freezing January count? Please. If homelessness rises, they tell us the problem is “complex.” If it falls, suddenly one mayor deserves a trophy and a Netflix documentary.
Meanwhile, the most obvious variable in the room gets ignored completely. Border enforcement matters. Federal policy matters. When fewer people are flowing illegally into the country, cities absorb less downstream chaos. That is not controversial outside of Denver faculty lounges and nonprofit board retreats. But acknowledging that would interrupt the grift cycle, and nobody cashing checks off the homelessness industrial complex wants that conversation.
Source: The Denver Gazette
Share your thoughts...