The Denver Gazette reports that the Denver City Council introduced a municipal sentencing reform bill aimed at aligning city penalties with state law and, in the sponsors’ language, helping “stop criminalizing poverty.” The bill was heavily revised and amended, then moved forward on a 10-2 vote, with Councilmembers Darrell Watson and Amanda Sawyer dissenting.
The phrase “stop criminalizing poverty” is where the bullshit detector starts beeping. Nobody serious wants poor people jailed because they are broke. But Denver’s ruling class has developed a bad habit of using poverty as a universal solvent to dissolve accountability, consequences, and any uncomfortable conversation about repeat municipal offenses.
The Bullet Point Brief
- The bill would align Denver municipal sentences with comparable state penalties and cap municipal-only offenses at the state petty offense level. That sounds tidy. It also means Denver is once again shrinking consequences while calling it compassion.
- The article notes that under current Denver rules, some low-level municipal offenses can bring months in jail, while state law caps the same conduct much lower. For example, stealing a loaf of bread has been punishable in Denver municipal court by up to 300 days, while state law caps the same conduct at 10 days.
- The Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled that municipalities may not impose sentences harsher than state law for identical offenses. So yes, there is a real legal alignment issue here. That does not mean every piece of ideological packaging deserves a standing ovation.
- Supporters argue longer jail sentences can destabilize people, causing loss of housing, work, Social Security benefits, child care ability, or immigration consequences. That is a legitimate fairness concern. But fairness without accountability becomes Denver’s favorite hobby: apologizing to offenders while residents, workers, and businesses eat the bill.
- Opponents warned the proposal could reduce discretion for enforcement involving offenses such as trespassing, wrongs to minors, carrying weapons, and domestic violence. David Howard put it bluntly, saying the city should not “throw the gas pedal out the window.”
My Bottom Line
This is the real debate: fairness versus accountability.
Denver should not keep penalties on the books that conflict with state law or punish a minor offense 30 times harder than the state would. That is not conservative, liberal, or moderate. That is just basic legal housekeeping. If the Colorado Supreme Court says the city has to clean up its sentencing structure, then clean it up.
But Denver always has to add the incense.
Instead of saying, “We need to align municipal penalties with state law and make sure sentencing is proportional,” the activist-policy machine wraps the whole thing in “stop criminalizing poverty.” That phrase does a lot of emotional laundering. It suggests the real problem is not crime, disorder, repeat offenses, trespassing, theft, camping, or quality-of-life decay. No, the real problem is apparently residents expecting laws to mean something.
Denver has been running this experiment for years: weaken enforcement, soften consequences, rebrand disorder as compassion, then act shocked when downtown empties out, businesses complain, residents feel unsafe, and taxpayers ask why City Hall governs like consequences are a hate crime.
There is a way to be fair without being foolish. There is a way to avoid excessive penalties without turning municipal court into a suggestion box. But Denver’s Council majority keeps choosing the same path: break basic order, call the wreckage compassion, and then lecture everyone else for noticing the smell.
Source: The Denver Gazette
Share your thoughts...