The Denver Gazette reports that a series of TV ads for Michael Bennet’s gubernatorial campaign displayed disclaimers saying they were paid for by “Bennet for Colorado,” his U.S. Senate campaign committee, instead of “Bennet for Governor,” his registered gubernatorial campaign committee. The story says that could be a potential violation of Colorado campaign-finance law, and it lands while Bennet is already under investigation over allegations that his Senate campaign paid expenses tied to his run for governor.
There goes the clean-government halo, clanking down the stairs. Bennet is running for a Colorado job while his ads reportedly point voters to a federal campaign committee. That is the kind of campaign-finance mess Democrats usually pretend only happens when some county-level Republican forgets which form to staple to which damn envelope. But this is not a school board treasurer with a printer jam. This is a sitting U.S. senator with consultants, lawyers, compliance people, and enough polished-brand nonsense to pave I-70.
The Bullet Point Brief
- The Gazette says Bennet’s gubernatorial TV ads used disclaimers indicating they were paid for by his U.S. Senate committee. That is not exactly the opening act you want when auditioning to run the whole state.
- Bennet’s campaign says the gubernatorial campaign “obviously paid for every penny” of the ads and says “Bennet for Colorado” and “Bennet for Governor” are used interchangeably. Except one is his Senate committee and one is his governor committee. Details, details. Only voters and campaign-finance law care.
- The article says some of the ads were taken down shortly after the story ran. Nothing says “totally fine” like yanking the ads after reporters notice the disclaimer smells like a campaign-finance banana peel.
- Colorado law bars candidate committees from accepting contributions from or making contributions to another candidate committee, including one established under federal law. That is why the buckets matter. State race. Federal committee. Different rules. This is not decorative paperwork.
- Bennet is already facing consolidated campaign-finance complaints over potentially illegal spending by his Senate campaign for gubernatorial expenses, with a hearing scheduled for July 28, after the June primary. Transparency after voting is always convenient for the people who already got the ballots counted.
My Bottom Line
Normal Coloradans are sick of elites treating rules like speed bumps for peasants.
Bennet’s entire brand is sober competence. Serious man. Serious résumé. Serious voice. Serious concern face. Then the campaign steps on a rake marked “which committee paid for this ad?” right in front of the neighborhood. That is not inspiring leadership. That is a compliance seminar with yard signs.
Do not overstate the legal case. The investigation will do what the investigation does. Maybe this ends up being sloppy labeling. Maybe the campaign can show the right money paid for the ads. Fine. But the optics are rotten, and the hypocrisy is the point.
Democrats lecture everyone about democracy, transparency, accountability, and clean elections. Then when their own paperwork smells funny, suddenly it is probably just an innocent oopsie from Team Credentialed Adult. Spare us. Campaign committees exist for a reason. Voters deserve to know who is paying to sell them the next polished Denver-approved savior.
Michael Bennet wants Colorado to trust him with the whole damn state. His opening act is apparently: “Please consult yesterday’s disclosures.” That may work for lawyers and consultants. For everyone else, it looks like the managerial class selling competence while losing track of the labels on its own money buckets.
Source: The Gazette
Share your thoughts...