CPR News reports on Bradley White, a Colorado Springs homeowner who installed a laundry-to-landscape graywater system at his house. Translation: his washing machine water can be diverted with a lever and sent through mulch to water shrubs instead of being used once and shoved into the sewer like a well-trained bureaucratic offering.
The problem is Colorado Springs city code. According to CPR News, the city prohibits graywater use and allows water to be used only once. White has filed both a civil case and a water court petition challenging that setup. Meanwhile, Colorado changed state law in 2024 to allow graywater unless local governments opt out. Colorado Springs opted out, because apparently the official conservation strategy is to talk about saving water while banning people from saving water in the wrong font.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Bradley White has a laundry-to-landscape system at his Colorado Springs home. It is not a moon base. It is not a secret dam. It is washing-machine water going to bushes instead of sewer pipes.
- Colorado Springs code says no graywater and only allows water to be used once. Because nothing says “drought-conscious West” like using water exactly one time and then yeeting it into the system like a obedient little utility customer.
- White filed a civil case and a water court petition. That means a resident trying to water shrubs with laundry water is now in the legal thunderdome, because Colorado water policy can turn a hose bib into a graduate seminar with filing fees.
- State law changed in 2024 to allow graywater unless local governments opt out. Colorado Springs opted out. So the state opened the door, and the city immediately stood in it wearing a reflective vest and holding a clipboard.
- The utility says compliant systems can be expensive, adoption is limited, and it wants more time to study how graywater fits with its centralized reuse strategy. Of course it does. Conservation is beautiful when it comes with consultants, grants, staff reports, and ribbon cuttings. A homeowner with a lever? Dangerous heresy.
My Bottom Line
Colorado water law is complicated. Anyone who says otherwise is either selling something or has never met a ditch company attorney. Water rights matter. Return flows matter. Downstream users matter. This state was not built on “just do whatever with water because vibes.” Fine. Adults can admit that.
But this is still peak Colorado water insanity. We spend every summer getting lectured about drought, climate pressure, shrinking supplies, sustainability, xeriscaping, conservation, and the holy gospel of “every drop matters.” Then a guy tries to reuse laundry water on shrubs, and city government reacts like he is trying to privatize the Arkansas River with PVC pipe and a Home Depot receipt.
Maybe graywater is not the magic bullet. The article makes clear experts do not treat it like salvation, and the impacts can be hard to quantify. Good. Nobody needs to pretend a washing machine hose is going to refill Lake Powell. But that is exactly why the ban looks so ridiculous. If this is a modest tool, treat it like a modest tool. Set reasonable standards. Protect public health. Respect water rights. Then get out of the way.
The real problem is the centralized-only brain rot. Normal people are constantly told to conserve, adapt, pay more, and trust the experts. But when they actually try to solve a small problem themselves, the experts show up with a clipboard and a ban hammer. Colorado Springs can preach conservation all it wants, but banning practical homeowner conservation while studying the issue forever is not leadership. It is sustainability theater with plumbing.
Source: CPR News
Share your thoughts...