The Denver Gazette reports that organizers behind Initiative 175 submitted more than 180,000 signatures to place a road-funding measure on Colorado’s November ballot. The proposal would require transportation-related revenue to be used specifically for roads, bridges, safety improvements, planning, engineering, and Colorado State Patrol operations. Organizers need 124,000 valid signatures to qualify.
The article also highlights the escalating fight at the Capitol over transportation dollars. Lawmakers passed HB 1430, a measure designed to blunt or effectively negate Initiative 175 if voters approve it. Supporters of the ballot measure argue Colorado repeatedly siphons transportation-related revenue into the general fund while roads deteriorate and congestion worsens. Legislators counter that dedicating the money to roads could affect funding for education, health care, and other state priorities.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Initiative 175 would dedicate transportation-related revenue specifically to roads, bridges, safety, planning, and State Patrol operations. Which sounds suspiciously like what most taxpayers already assumed was happening.
- Organizers submitted over 180,000 signatures, far above the required threshold. Turns out people notice potholes more than legislative press releases.
- Legislators responded with HB 1430, a preemptive maneuver designed to reduce or reroute the initiative’s impact if voters approve it. Democracy is sacred, right up until voters might prioritize asphalt over activist budgeting.
- Capitol leaders warn the measure could affect funding for schools, health care, and other programs. Colorado’s political class calls everything an “investment” right up until somebody asks why transportation taxes are not funding transportation.
- The deeper issue is accountability. If Colorado needs a ballot initiative to force transportation dollars toward transportation infrastructure, that says quite a bit about the people currently holding the checkbook.
My Bottom Line
I fully support this initiative.
And every time I discuss it with people, they are stunned to learn that transportation-related revenue in Colorado does not automatically go toward roads and bridges. The taxes you pay on automotive purchases, registrations, and transportation activity often flow into the great, shapeless blob of the general fund so the ruling Democrats at the Capitol can finance whatever social-engineering hobby currently makes them feel morally luminous.
Roads? Bridges? Congestion? Infrastructure? Pffffttt. Quiet, peasant. Now get on the bus.
The sheer arrogance of HB 1430 is what really gets me. I find the authors of that bill despicable. Truly. It was a preemptive attempt to muzzle the will of voters before the public even had a chance to speak. The same crowd constantly lecturing everyone about “sacred democracy” suddenly became very creative when rural and suburban Colorado might actually use democracy to reorder spending priorities.
Funny how that works.
And this is the broader Capitol disease: everything gets called an “investment,” but almost nothing comes with honest accountability. Democrats love ribbon cuttings, climate plans, equity initiatives, transit slogans, and consultant-crafted messaging campaigns. Meanwhile, ordinary Coloradans are blowing tires on cratered roads while sitting in traffic funded by decades of avoidance and gimmicks.
Now, to be fair, the tradeoffs are real. The state budget is finite. Roads compete with other priorities. Fine. Have that debate honestly. But stop pretending taxpayers are irrational for asking why transportation-generated revenue does not consistently fund transportation infrastructure.
That is not extremism. That is basic common sense.
And if Colorado truly needs a citizen initiative to force the government to fund roads honestly, then that tells you everything you need to know about the people already managing the money.
Source: The Denver Gazette
Share your thoughts...