News Sheet

Broncos Burnham Yard CBA Looks Like a Shakedown

Editorial collage of a proposed stadium over a Denver neighborhood with symbolic approval barriers in the foreground.
Looks like neighborhood input until the invoice shows up.
Written by Scott K. James

A proposed Community Benefits Agreement around the Broncos’ Burnham Yard project raises the usual question: neighborhood protection or a government-backed toll booth?

The Denver Post’s Elliott Wenzler reports that neighbors around Denver’s La Alma-Lincoln Park neighborhood are preparing to negotiate with the Broncos over a legally binding Community Benefits Agreement tied to the team’s planned Burnham Yard stadium development. The coalition, called Burnham Yard Community Action, says it wants to protect the neighborhood’s history, culture, housing, small businesses, and quality of life as the project moves forward.

The group’s stated priorities include housing affordability, childcare, youth programs, economic empowerment, arts funding, local business support, and even “supporting reparations for communities that have been historically harmed.” The Broncos, for their part, say they look forward to negotiating with urgency and cooperation. In other words: the developer has a giant project, the activists have a wish list, and the lawyers are warming up in the bullpen.

The Bullet Point Brief

  • The Broncos’ planned Burnham Yard stadium project is expected to come with CBA negotiations involving neighborhood groups, nonprofits, arts organizations, housing advocates, and unions. Nothing says “streamlined development” like sixteen groups and a consultant with a clipboard.
  • Community Benefits Agreements usually require developers to fund projects meant to offset impacts, like affordable housing, youth programs, local arts, childcare, and economic development. Some of that can sound reasonable. That is how the shakedown gets a nice haircut.
  • The neighborhood has deep roots, including a predominantly Hispanic history, the Art District on Santa Fe, and a 2021 city historic district designation honoring the Chicano movement. Respecting that history matters. Turning it into a government-enforced invoice is where the wheels start wobbling.
  • The Broncos still need approvals for a small area plan, rezoning, a development agreement, and possible tax-increment financing. Translation: City Hall holds the keys, and the CBA crowd knows exactly where the leverage lives.
  • Councilwoman Jamie Torres said the final vote will need the community to feel okay with the project. That sounds sweet until “community feels okay” becomes “pay everyone on the list or your project sleeps with the fishes.”

My Bottom Line

If a developer wants to go into a community their project impacts and voluntarily make improvements, that is great. In fact, that is the way it should be. Good neighbors do not just drop a massive project into a place, cash the checks, and leave the locals with traffic, noise, and a souvenir cup.

But these Community Benefits Agreements are the new darlings of leftist Democrats, and they started coming onto my radar about a year ago. They are being sold as normal, compassionate, modern civic practice. Before long, Democrats will try to convince everyone that a CBA is simply part of doing business. It is not.

A CBA makes a project more expensive. Always. And when a project gets more expensive, that cost does not evaporate into the Denver skyline. It gets passed down to consumers, tenants, ticket buyers, businesses, taxpayers, or whoever is standing closest when the bill lands. That is basic math, which is why government tries so hard to hide it behind words like “equity” and “community.”

Let’s call this what it is: a government-sanctioned, government-enforced shakedown. If the city quietly makes clear that approvals, rezoning, financing tools, and final votes depend on a developer satisfying a coalition’s demands, then this is not charity. It is leverage dressed up as justice.

And that is the grift. The left loves these arrangements because they create new toll booths between private investment and public approval. More groups to appease. More consultants to hire. More side deals to negotiate. More money flowing through the activist-nonprofit-government ecosystem. The neighborhood gets used as the moral cover, while the political class gets another mechanism for control.

Build responsibly. Mitigate real impacts. Respect the neighborhood. Fund infrastructure. Be a good neighbor. All of that is fair. But do not pretend a CBA is some pure act of civic virtue. It is a shakedown with a press release, and Democrats love it because the house always gets a cut.


Source: The Denver Post

About the author

Scott K. James

A 4th generation Northern Colorado native, Scott K. James is a veteran broadcaster, professional communicator, and principled leader. Widely recognized for his thoughtful, common-sense approach to addressing issues that affect families, businesses, and communities, Scott, his wife, Julie, and son, Jack, call Johnstown, Colorado, home. A former mayor of Johnstown, James is a staunch defender of the Constitution and the rule of law, the free market, and the power of the individual. Scott has delighted in a lifetime of public service and continues that service as a Weld County Commissioner representing District 2.

Share your thoughts...