News Sheet

Colorado Preschool Enrollment Surges, but Quality Questions Remain

Colorado preschool classroom with teacher, children, and learning materials during class
Access is up. The fine print is too.
Written by Scott K. James

Colorado ranks near the top in preschool access, but weak quality benchmarks and long-term tradeoffs deserve a hard look.

The Denver Post reports that state-funded preschool enrollment is booming nationwide, with Colorado near the top of the list. Roughly 70% of the state’s 4-year-olds are now enrolled in preschool programs after the launch of universal preschool in 2023, placing Colorado third in the country for access. fileciteturn4file0

That expansion is part of a broader national trend, with states pouring a record $14.4 billion into early childhood education and enrolling about 1.8 million kids. But the report also flags a key issue. Even as access expands, quality benchmarks lag. Colorado, for example, meets only 2 of 10 national quality standards, highlighting the tradeoff between scale and substance.

The Bullet Point Brief

  • Colorado now has about 70% of 4-year-olds in state-funded preschool. Big numbers, big rollout.
  • The state offers up to 15 hours a week for most kids, with some qualifying for 30. Helpful, but not exactly full-time childcare.
  • Despite the expansion, Colorado meets just 2 of 10 quality benchmarks. Quantity is winning. Quality is… pending.
  • The program mostly targets 4-year-olds, with limited access for younger kids unless they have disabilities. That leaves a big gap.
  • Nationally, states are spending billions on preschool, even as private providers warn these programs can undercut their business models.

My Bottom Line

There is real good news here. More kids getting early education is a win. Anyone who has spent time around kindergarten teachers knows the gap between kids who had some early learning and those who did not.

But let’s not pretend this comes without tradeoffs.

First, this is not a childcare solution. It is a partial-day program aimed mostly at 4-year-olds. If you are a working parent with a toddler or an infant, this does exactly nothing for you. If you need full-day care, you are still piecing it together.

Second, these programs do not exist in a vacuum. They are funded with dollars that have to come from somewhere. In Colorado’s case, that includes money streams like CCAP that were already supporting private childcare providers. When government expands into a space, it does not just “add capacity.” It reshapes the market, and not always in a healthy way.

Third, and this is the uncomfortable question nobody in Denver wants to ask. Do we really want this level of reliance on state-run systems for early childhood?

Because once you build it, you own it. The expectations, the costs, the bureaucracy, the politics. And when the state starts becoming the default provider, private options shrink, flexibility shrinks, and parents get fewer real choices.

And here is another question worth asking out loud. Are these dollars following kids to all providers, including faith-based preschools? Or are we quietly building a system that sidelines them?

This is the balancing act. Access versus quality. Public versus private. Help versus dependence.

Right now, Colorado is leaning hard into expansion. The question is whether anyone is thinking just as hard about the long-term consequences.


Source: The Denver Post

About the author

Scott K. James

A 4th generation Northern Colorado native, Scott K. James is a veteran broadcaster, professional communicator, and principled leader. Widely recognized for his thoughtful, common-sense approach to addressing issues that affect families, businesses, and communities, Scott, his wife, Julie, and son, Jack, call Johnstown, Colorado, home. A former mayor of Johnstown, James is a staunch defender of the Constitution and the rule of law, the free market, and the power of the individual. Scott has delighted in a lifetime of public service and continues that service as a Weld County Commissioner representing District 2.

Share your thoughts...