Political Sheet

Denver’s 16th Street Oversight Problem

29 seconds ago
by Scott K. James
3 min read
Editorial illustration of a brick sewer beneath Denver's 16th Street with City Hall and downtown buildings above.
The sewer was old. The oversight questions are newer.
Written by Scott K. James

A historic brick sewer helped trigger an $18 million change order. The bigger question is why Denver’s oversight committee was reportedly left out.

Denver’s historic brick sewers have been underneath the city for generations. Apparently, accountability at Denver City Hall is a much newer installation.

9NEWS reports that complications involving a historic brick sewer beneath the 16th Street project led to an roughly $18 million change order. Old infrastructure can surprise you. Anyone who has ever opened up a century-old building knows that. The more interesting surprise, according to the city auditor, is that the City Council committee responsible for overseeing the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure apparently did not know about the major cost change.

That turns a construction problem into a government problem. The brick sewer did not forget to brief City Council. Somebody did.

The Bullet Point Brief

  • The underground surprise was expensive. Work involving Denver’s historic brick sewer system helped drive an approximately $18 million change order on the 16th Street project. Nothing says “downtown revitalization” quite like discovering another eight-figure bill beneath the pavement.
  • The sewer is not really the scandal here. Historic infrastructure is complicated. Pipes are old. Conditions change. Construction finds things. That happens. What should not “just happen” is an $18 million government spending surprise wandering through City Hall without the elected oversight committee apparently knowing about it.
  • The auditor raised the accountability question. According to 9NEWS, the auditor said the City Council committee overseeing DOTI was not made aware of the change order. That is a fairly important detail when the detail costs roughly $18 million.
  • Denver now owes taxpayers some basic answers. Who approved the change? When did city officials know the cost had ballooned? What notice was required? Who was supposed to tell the council committee? These are not complicated ideological questions. They are the governmental equivalent of asking for a receipt.
  • Taxpayers once again get the privilege of paying first and asking questions later. Denver residents have watched the 16th Street project rack up costs while City Hall promotes the finished product. Fine. But if the people charged with oversight are learning about massive spending decisions after the machinery is already moving, the city has a plumbing problem that no brick mason can fix.

My Bottom Line

I am not going to pretend finding a historic sewer under an old downtown street is some shocking act of municipal incompetence. Denver is an old city. Old cities have old stuff underground. Sometimes the expensive surprise really is buried beneath your feet.

But an $18 million change order should not be buried in the bureaucracy.

If the auditor is right that the council committee overseeing DOTI was not informed, Denver needs to explain exactly how that happened. Not with a 47-slide presentation, three acronyms and a consultant explaining the “stakeholder communication environment.” Just answer the questions. Who approved it? When? Who knew? What notification was required? And why did the elected officials supposedly responsible for oversight appear to be outside the loop?

Taxpayers are not City Hall’s ATM. You do not swipe the card for another $18 million and slide the receipt across the counter afterward with a shrug. Denver may have uncovered a century-old sewer beneath 16th Street, but the bigger discovery could be an accountability system every bit as cracked.

Source: KUSA RSS Feed: local

Now It's Your Turn...