Political Sheet

Polis Is Right on Federal Grant Power, but Not Innocent

Governor Jared Polis at a podium with federal grant documents and Colorado imagery
Federal strings look different when the other guy holds them.
Written by Scott K. James

Polis is right to question political control over federal grants. He is also late to notice the strings Colorado helped tie.

Governor Jared Polis has submitted formal comments opposing an Office of Management and Budget proposal that would give federal agencies and political appointees broader control over grant money. The proposed framework could allow agencies to alter award terms, suspend funding for up to 90 days when deemed in the government’s “best interest,” or cancel awards before projects are complete. A 2025 executive order also directed senior political appointees to review discretionary grants for consistency with administration priorities and the “national interest.” That is real power, and putting more of it in political hands is a legitimate problem.

Polis says federal money should support the best ideas, not reward allies or punish states that disagree with the president. He argues that Colorado must be able to rely on federal funding for roads, public safety, health care, research and other services without having the rules changed after work has started. On that narrow point, he is right.

He is also standing waist-deep in the federal-funding swamp while complaining that somebody else might touch the water controls. Colorado’s ruling class spent years building budgets, programs, nonprofit networks and local-government plans around money from Washington. Now that the wrong political team may be holding the strings, Polis has suddenly discovered federalism. Welcome aboard, Governor. We kept a pocket Constitution warm for you.

The Bullet Point Brief

  • The OMB proposal deserves scrutiny. Federal agencies could gain broader authority to change grant conditions, pause awards for up to 90 days or terminate funding before a project is finished. When governments and organizations have already spent money based on a federal commitment, that can leave them holding the bag. Centralized discretion does not become harmless because the person wielding it has an American flag behind the desk.
  • Political appointees are being handed a larger role. The Trump administration’s grant policy calls for senior appointees to review discretionary awards and apply administration priorities. That is not neutral grant administration. It is politics wearing an accounting visor. Trump does not get a hall pass merely because Democrats perfected the broader racket.
  • Polis says Colorado has defended more than $1.21 billion in federal funding since January 2025. The state says the threatened money includes substance-abuse prevention, public safety and transportation funding. That number also reveals the deeper problem: Colorado has become heavily dependent on decisions made by people working nearly 1,700 miles away.
  • Colorado Democrats love strings-attached money until somebody else grabs the strings. Denver has no problem ordering counties, cities, businesses, energy workers, landlords, parents and taxpayers around. But when Washington threatens to use the same centralized machinery against Colorado, everyone at the Capitol suddenly starts quoting local control like they found religion during lunch.
  • The real scandal is government-by-grant-money. States and municipalities build permanent obligations around temporary federal promises, then act shocked when a new administration changes priorities. The public is told these funding streams are stable, scientific and above politics. Then Election Day happens and the entire operation turns into a hostage negotiation with spreadsheets.

My Bottom Line

Polis is right that presidents should not be able to casually rewrite congressional spending decisions, yank promised funding on a political whim or leave communities paying bills after Washington changes the deal. Concentrating more grant authority in political appointees is dangerous. It would still be dangerous under a president I liked.

But spare us the virgin outrage.

Colorado’s Democratic machine has spent years centralizing authority whenever it served its agenda. It lectures local governments from Denver, cheers federal mandates from Washington and treats grant conditions as enlightened governance when the approved people are writing them. Now the bulldozer has a different driver, and suddenly centralized power is a constitutional crisis.

That is the lesson here. The problem is bigger than Trump versus Polis. The problem is that government has built an enormous dependency chain in which states, cities, universities and nonprofits organize themselves around federal cash and federal permission. Everybody loves the arrangement while their faction controls the valve. The moment power changes hands, yesterday’s compassionate partnership becomes today’s political extortion.

Polis gets to be right about the danger. He does not get to pretend he had nothing to do with building a system where the danger was inevitable. Colorado’s ruling class loves strings-attached money. It just hates discovering that strings have two ends.


Source: Governor Jared Polis

Now It's Your Turn...