Rocky Mountain Voice reports that El Paso County Clerk Steve Schleiker submitted a $79,850 proposal for federal election-security money just six days before Attorney General Phil Weiser sued the Trump administration over conditions attached to the same Homeland Security Grant Program.
The county’s request is not for new voting machines, partisan gadgets, or some tin-foil contraption designed in a basement. It would pay for an outside cybersecurity review, penetration testing, physical-security assessments, incident-response planning, training, and regional exercises with law enforcement and emergency-management partners. In other words, locks, alarms, drills, and adults checking whether the system can take a punch.
The state’s lawsuit argues that the federal government lacks authority to attach election-related conditions to homeland-security grants and that the requirements are unrelated to the program’s counterterrorism purpose. That legal argument deserves an actual hearing. But the split-screen is still ridiculous: Denver is in court fighting over who controls the strings while Colorado’s largest county is trying to use the money for plain old operational security.
The Bullet Point Brief
- El Paso County asked for $79,850 to hire an outside firm to review election cybersecurity and physical security. This is not election-fraud cosplay. It is what competent organizations call maintenance.
- The largest budget item is a $20,000 independent cybersecurity assessment, followed by $12,000 for vulnerability and penetration testing. Apparently checking whether someone can break into your system is controversial now because Washington attached paperwork to the crowbar.
- The proposal also includes physical-security reviews, incident-response planning, threat detection, tabletop exercises, training, remediation, and retesting. Boring? Yes. Useful? Also yes. Democracy does not run on hashtags and sternly worded press conferences.
- Colorado’s lawsuit challenges federal conditions that include voter-citizenship verification and election-worker requirements. Schleiker did not take sides on the lawsuit. He said his office still needs guidance from the state on who does what, which is a charming reminder that lawsuits travel faster than instructions.
- The Secretary of State’s Office had not responded to Rocky Mountain Voice’s questions by publication. The state can find time to sue the federal government, but apparently a county asking how to implement the rules gets the government version of “your call is very important to us.”
My Bottom Line
This is Colorado’s ruling class doing its favorite two-step. First, scream that democracy is under attack. Then, when actual election-security work requires chain-of-command accountability, outside review, and uncomfortable testing, turn it into an ideological knife fight.
To be clear, the source does not show Phil Weiser opposing election security. It shows the state challenging the legality of federal conditions while El Paso County seeks funds under the same program for real security improvements. That distinction matters. So does the contrast. One side is checking the locks. The other is in court arguing over who is allowed to hold the key.
Schleiker’s proposal is not extravagant. It is under $80,000 for the kind of work every serious institution should already understand: test the network, inspect the building, rehearse the response, train the people, and fix what fails. If election integrity is truly sacred, this should be the least dramatic paragraph in Colorado politics.
But Denver cannot leave anything boring. Local officials deal with systems, staffing, deadlines, vendors, and consequences. State-level politicians turn the same problem into a lawsuit, a press release, and a resistance costume. Then everyone acts shocked when normal people stop trusting the process.
Election security becomes controversial the moment it stops being a slogan and starts requiring adult supervision. That is the real problem here. Not hysteria. Not conspiracy theories. Just a state government so addicted to political theater that even checking the locks has to become a constitutional cage match.
Source: Rocky Mountain Voice
Now It's Your Turn...