Colorado College Abortion Bill Turns Campuses Into Distribution Hubs

The Denver Gazette, in a report by Marissa Ventrelli, covers a bill moving through the Colorado legislature that would require colleges and universities to provide medication abortion services through campus health centers. The measure, House Bill 1355, cleared the House Education Committee and would apply to public, private, and community colleges, while exempting religious-based institutions.

Supporters argue the bill is about access. They say college students often rely on campus health centers because they lack transportation, time, or money to seek care elsewhere. Sponsors also point to Amendment 79, the 2024 constitutional amendment enshrining abortion rights in Colorado, as justification for pushing institutions to make abortion medication available on campus.

Opponents, as the article details, see something very different. They argue the bill forces schools to become participants in a moral and medical controversy, while offering too little attention to adoption, coercion, regret, and the potential adverse effects of abortion drugs. The committee advanced the bill on an 8-5 party-line vote, with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed.

The Bullet Point Brief

• House Bill 1355 would require Colorado colleges to provide abortion medication services through campus health centers, except at religious-based institutions. Because apparently higher education was still missing one more ideological mandate.
• Democrats backing the bill say it is about protecting access after Colorado voters approved Amendment 79 in 2024. Their argument is simple: if abortion is a constitutional right, every campus should help deliver it. Subtle as a brick through a church window.
• Students testified that on-campus access would reduce transportation, scheduling, financial, and emotional burdens. That is the central case supporters make, and the article gives it a fair hearing.
• Opponents argued the bill ignores adoption information, downplays health risks, and fails students who may be coerced or later regret the decision. In other words, a lot of concern for access, not nearly as much for aftermath.
• The bill passed committee on a straight party-line vote, and Republicans raised questions about cost, calling it an unfunded mandate. Democrats replied the state would not pay because students would buy the medication themselves. Government logic at its finest: mandate it, then pretend it is free.

My Bottom Line

This is where the moral fog lifts for me. More and more, I do not see these fights as left versus right. I see them as good versus evil. And this latest stunt from the Denver and Boulder ruling class reeks of moral rot.

There is a real distinction here that our self-anointed enlightened betters refuse to admit. It is one thing to argue that abortion should remain legal. It is another thing entirely to turn institutions of higher learning into abortion distribution hubs and call that progress. Colleges are supposed to educate, form, and prepare young adults for life. The Denver crowd seems determined to make them one-stop shops for chemical despair.

That is what makes this feel so much darker than the usual policy fight. For some of these ruling elite Democrats, liberal ideology is not just a worldview. It is a religion. And abortion is one of its sacraments. Not private, not rare, not reluctant. Public, celebrated, institutionalized, and rubbed right in your face with the smug confidence of people who think moral opposition itself is the only sin left in Colorado politics.

And let me be plain. The article presents supporters as talking about convenience, logistics, and equality. But when the state starts demanding that colleges stock and dispense pills designed to end unborn life, the language of convenience becomes grotesque. That is not compassion. That is not empowerment. That is a cold, bureaucratic form of evil dressed up in campus wellness branding and constitutional slogans.

Source: The Denver Gazette