Apparently, Denver’s letting the culinary cops out of their cages again. According to The Denver Gazette, activists are now greenlit to circulate petitions that would ban the sale of foie gras in the city. Yep—because nothing screams ’emergency legislation’ like what fancy people smear on crackers.
The Bullet Point Brief
- Foie gras—the upscale duck liver pâté of yuppie dreams—is under attack from ballot-box biologists with clipboards and feelings.
- Activists say force-feeding geese is animal cruelty; I say welcome to nature—it ain’t a Disney cartoon.
- City OK’d petition circulation because banning food apparently ranks higher than fixing fentanyl streets and crumbling infrastructure.
- This nonsense isn’t about compassion—it’s about control: telling you what you can and can’t put on your plate.
- Next up? Banning brisket for hurting cow feelings. God help us all.
My Bottomline
Let me get this straight—Denver’s fine with tent cities sprouting like weeds on Colfax but suddenly grabs its pearls over duck liver? If you’re offended by foie gras, here’s a tip: don’t eat it. Problem solved. But no—we gotta slap it on a ballot and decide culinary ethics like it’s moral Monopoly Night at Whole Foods. What’s next—banning fried chicken because chickens don’t want to be delicious?
This isn’t about goose rights—it’s about power-hungry progressives playing nutritional nanny state with a side of smug superiority. Newsflash, folks: freedom means you can choose foie gras or tofu or whatever fermented nonsense TikTok’s selling this week. MAHA forever—Make Appetites Hungry Again!
Regarding downtown, did not previous Commissioners purchase city blocks with the intention of expanding the judicial system there? Why can there be justification of extra debt when walking away from previous investment geared towards for such a moment as expansion.? And would that devalue the investment by moving away from downtown? And which Commissioners are going to represent the voter rich city of Greeley?