In my opinion, the Democrats have only had one clear policy message this election cycle – just one: Abortion. Abortion has been solely and central to the Democrats this election cycle. We need honest conversations about abortion. Not yelling matches. Conversations. We need conversations about what it means to be Pro-Life. Because one can be pro-life and pro body autonomy. The two are not mutually exclusive.
To tee up that conversation that we will begin post-election, I want to detail the states in which babies are on the ballot today. Here’s a breakdown of each abortion-related measure appearing on the 2024 ballot in 10 states:
South Dakota – Abortion Rights Initiative: This measure seeks to affirm the right to abortion in a state with some of the most restrictive laws post-Roe. The initiative would counter existing constraints, reinforcing reproductive choice. Advocates argue it restores rights curtailed by recent state actions, whereas critics see it as contradictory to local values.
(We’re also going to have a conversation about “rights.” Rights are not granted by the government. Rights are granted by the Creator – read the preamble to the Declaration of Independence – and protected by the government. I do not believe abortion is a right. It is a small segment of the larger conversation that is body autonomy. We can discuss the right to be secure in one’s person and property – that’s a right. The founders placed heavy emphasis on “the laws of nature and nature’s God – that is the Creator of whom they speak in the preamble. More later.)
Arizona – Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment: This measure seeks to amend Arizona’s state constitution to affirm the right to reproductive decisions, including abortion, up to fetal viability. If passed, it would prevent legislative restrictions on abortion and bolster current legal access. Supporters argue it safeguards personal health choices, while opponents view it as an overreach that undermines potential life.
Colorado – Reproductive Health Rights Amendment: This measure proposes enshrining access to reproductive health services, such as abortion, as a constitutional right in Colorado. It reinforces protections for reproductive autonomy and limits the state’s ability to impose significant restrictions. Proponents highlight the need for clear legal safeguards post-Roe, while critics often point to moral and ethical concerns.
Florida – Protecting Reproductive Rights Initiative: This amendment aims to protect the right to abortion up until fetal viability, with exceptions for the life or health of the mother. The initiative responds to tightening restrictions and aims to preempt future limitations. Advocates underscore the importance of preserving choice, whereas detractors argue it fails to prioritize the rights of the unborn.
Maryland – Reproductive Rights Amendment: Maryland’s ballot measure would embed reproductive rights, including access to abortion, in the state constitution. This codifies current legal practices and protects them against future legislative changes. Proponents stress the amendment’s role in solidifying established rights, while opposition voices express concern about unrestricted access.
Missouri – Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative: This measure proposes constitutional protection for reproductive choices, including abortion, until fetal viability. It is seen as a counter to Missouri’s strict post-Roe regulations. Supporters argue it provides necessary autonomy, whereas opponents contend it conflicts with the state’s pro-life values.
Montana – Reproductive Decision Rights Amendment: This citizen-initiated amendment would guarantee the right to make personal reproductive decisions, including abortion up to the point of viability. The measure emphasizes autonomy and limits state intervention. Backers argue it restores balance after legislative restrictions, while critics push for greater consideration of fetal rights.
Nebraska:
Protecting Reproductive Rights Initiative: This proposed amendment seeks to affirm the right to an abortion up to viability, reinforcing current practices and preventing further legislative restrictions.
Restrictive Abortion Measure: A competing amendment that proposes restrictions on abortions post-first trimester, allowing exceptions for medical emergencies or pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. This split reflects Nebraska’s divided approach to reproductive rights.
Nevada – Abortion Access Protection Amendment: This ballot measure would constitutionally secure the right to an abortion until 24 weeks of pregnancy, allowing post-viability regulations solely for maternal health concerns. Proponents argue it is essential for ensuring continued access, while opponents criticize it for enshrining what they see as extreme permissiveness.
New York – Reproductive Freedom Constitutional Amendment: The proposed amendment aims to constitutionally guarantee reproductive health rights, protecting current legal provisions for abortion. This measure seeks to prevent future legislative rollbacks. Supporters frame it as a vital safeguard, while opponents see it as unnecessary and potentially controversial.
